Skip to main content

The Music Conumdrum


I know for a fact that the fastest way to cause me to change from normal Andy to Jack Nicholson in The Shinning Andy, is to take away my music (that's right my arch-enemies, the secret is out there! Come at me! My secret underground mole man army is WAITING FOR YOU!). Anyone who knows me knows that music is such a central part of my life, an overwhelmingly huge part of my life. These modern times in which we live in are quite interesting for anyone with unquenchable thirst for music.

Two weeks ago, Beats Music was launched, a new streaming service from the company that makes the headphones everyone seems to love. Personally, I'm not a fan of the headphones, but there is so much chatter on various websites I frequent, that I found myself singing up for the free seven day trial. This is where the duality of The Music Conundrum begins. Here's the first part of this duality. Music is in my blood, and it always has been.

You want evidence? There exists a home movie from 1988, I was three years old, and I'm playing in the backyard with some kids from the neighborhood. On this tape, my mother is heard telling another mother, “You know when Andy gets up in the morning, he doesn't want to go potty, but the first thing he wants to do is listen to music.” That's how deep it runs in me. This is where the idea of Beats Music catches my eye. For $10 a month, you can listen to an unlimited amount of commercial free music. 80% of which has curated by actual, hardcore, music loving humans just like you.

The curated part is what impressed me most, as I was putting the app through it's paces, I searched for Harry Nilsson. Beats Music's “Intro to Nilsson” playlist was 80% the same as my “Andy's Guide to Harry” mix CD I made a few months ago. There's a Tom Hank's dance party mix, and Bruce Springsteen has a “Guide to Southern Soul” mix. You can download these playlists to your device and listen to them as much as you want, off line.

At its basic, Beats Music is trying to be the Netflix of music, plus a never ending on-line record party. This is where the other part of the duality I feel begins. You don't own this music, you're, essentially “renting” it. So why does the idea of using that bother me, when using Netflix doesn't? I think it's because music is perhaps the most personal of all the medias. Music taps directly into our hearts and souls in a way that movies don't. I'm not saying that a movie can't have the same effect, but there's something more immediate, more intimate about music.

I also want artists to get paid, what's the royalty rate on Beats? How does that work? Is it like Spotify—which I don't use—and it's famously low $0.006 and $.0084 rate per song stream? Beats has some music people at the head of it, so I would hope that artists are gonna get a better shake. It would never stop me from buying new music, I can't stop that. But it could let me try out an album I'm on the fence about before I decide to jump into picking up that shinny record. You know me, I love my vinyl, and I love my indie record shops. I would never want them to go away, so perhaps this is just more an evolution in the idea of how to discover new music?

This is The Music Conundrum I'm faced with. The duality of my music loving self in full form. The one side, overwhelmed by the like minded curation, and the sheer volume of music right at my fingertips. The other, wondering if it's really worth it, and if the artists are getting their fair share of the pie. The app could very well become a supplement to an already music rich life. A great way to find new favorites, and know that I could always pull up what I wanted when I wanted.

As of this writing, my free trial hasn't ended yet. Will I make the leap into a subscriber? I'm honestly not sure. So many people are trying to navigate these new waters of a streaming music on demand service, and what they may mean for the future of the music industry. I'll say this much about Beats Music, it's the first one that's grabbed my attention, so much so, I had to write about it. Again, will it replace going to a local record store? No. Will it replace my record collection? Hell no! What it could be, however, is a chance to satisfy almost every musical whim with the flick of a digital button. That excites me, but I want to make sure it's the right way of going about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Convincing Yourself You're Good.

I have Imposter Syndrome. Imposter Syndrome is that feeling that what you do isn't good enough, and that someone is gonna eventually figure out how woefully unqualified you are and kick you to the curb. One of the traits of my personality that I dislike is that I am way too hard on myself. Seriously, give my mind an inch and I will somehow figure out that I am the sole person responsible for the world's troubles.

Having Imposter Syndrome is kind of like playing the game Werewolf. My friends and I play a version of the game called One Night Ultimate Werewolf, in the game each player picks a card that gives them a specific role, either a villager or a werewolf, and the villagers all have distinct roles that they play on top of that--special abilities and the like. The object of the game is two fold, if you're a werewolf, you don't wanna be caught. If you're a village, you wanna catch the werewolves. Imposter Syndrome makes you feel like you're always in the role…

Where The Blues Are

I come to you again this week with another pair of blu-rays from those master celluloid handlers at Warner Archive. First up we have 1960’s “Where The Boys Are,” a defining teen picture of the era by MGM, and the film largely responsible for kicking off the whole cycle of 1960s beach films. The other is 1955’s “Pete Kelly’s Blues” a film starring, produced, and directed by Jack Webb--TV’s Joe Friday. Part of a deal Webb had made with Warner Brothers when he was setting up the original big screen version of “Dragnet” in the ‘50s. 
“Where The Boys Are” was set for the screen before the book it was based on had been released. Producer Joe Pasternak snatched up the rights to the book by Glendon Swarthout, which was originally titled “Unholy Spring.” Pasternak, strongly feeling “Where The Boys Are” would be the better title, persuaded Swarthout to change the book’s title. Pasternak also felt he could use the film as a starring vehicle for one of the stars of MGM’s record label, Connie Franc…

Twelve-Nine-Three

Picture it! Scilly, 1922! OK, actually Andy Ross’s Childhood Bedroom 1993. I had been given as a gift the dream attachment for my beloved Sega Genesis, the amazing Sega CD. For those of you young children who have only grown up in the era of XBox and Playstation, it may seem strange that there was once a time when the idea of playing a video game off of a compact disc was mind blowing. But it was, and I was fully ready to have my mind blown. To use a slogan of Sega’s ads of the era, I was ready to enter “The Next Level.”

The Sega CD model I had was the second one, the smaller model designed to go with the slimmer Genesis that had been introduced to the market. I had the first Genesis, the larger one, but the Sega CD came with an extension block that allowed it to partner it on the original model. You attached the Sega CD to your Genesis by a special connector on the side of system. The Sega CD came with a game to get you going, as was the norm with gaming systems at the time. The game …